SEC Commissioner Calls for ‘Consistent Legal Framework’ for All Asset Classes, Including Crypto – Regulation Bitcoin News

The commissioner of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) called for a “coherent and consistent legal framework that works across all asset classes,” including crypto assets. She warned that the SEC’s current enforcement-oriented approach would take 400 years to review all crypto tokens that are purported to be securities.

SEC Commissioner for Crypto Regulation

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce spoke about crypto regulation in her speech at the “Digital Assets at Duke” conference on January 20.

Noting that the securities regulator has “pursued registration violations in a seemingly haphazard manner, often years after the original offering,” the commissioner emphasized:

We need to develop a coherent and consistent legal framework that works across all asset classes. Our imprecise application of the law has created arbitrary and destructive results for crypto projects and customers.

“When we insist on applying the securities laws in this way, secondary token buyers are often left holding a bag of tokens they cannot trade or use because the SEC requires special treatment under the securities laws,” Peirce warned. “Many of these claims are enforced under a strict liability standard, so clarity is key.”

The commissioner continued: “Why not put a coherent legal framework in the rule?” elaboration:

After all, if we were to continue with our regulation-by-enforcement approach at the current pace, we’d be approaching 400 years before we pass through tokens that are purported to be securities.

“In contrast, the SEC rule would have universal — though not retroactive — coverage once it goes into effect,” she noted.

Commissioner Peirce further explained, “A rational framework should make it easier for bona fide crypto actors to comply with our securities laws, which would free up the SEC to focus more of its resources on bad faith actors.”

However, she warned:

Cryptoregulation is not easy to make good. If crypto-institutions are treated like ordinary depository institutions, requiring large layers of capital and lots of legal staff, crypto-innovation is likely to diminish.

This was not the first time that Commissioner Peirce has expressed concern about the way the SEC regulates the crypto sector. She has repeatedly criticized the securities watchdog for its approach aimed at enforcing the regulation of the crypto space. She also believes the regulator should have already approved a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). Last May, she warned that the SEC had dropped the ball on crypto oversight, saying, “We’re not allowing innovation and experimentation to develop in a healthy way, and there are long-term consequences of that failure.”

Commissioner Peirce is not alone in being concerned about the SEC’s enforcement-oriented approach. US Congressman Tom Emmer (R-MN), for example, has repeatedly criticized SEC Chairman Gary Gensler. “Under Chairman Gensler, the SEC has become a power-hungry regulator,” the lawmaker said last July.

Tags in this story

Crypto regulation, crypto regulatory framework, cryptocurrency regulation, enforcement focused crypto, hester peirce, Hester Peirce crypto, Hester Peirce cryptocurrency, SEC, SEC commissioner, SEC commissioner crypto, sec crypto regulation

Do you agree with SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce? Let us know in the comments section below.

Kevin Helms

An Austrian economics student, Kevin discovered Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open source systems, network effects, and the intersection of economics and cryptography.

Image credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Waiver: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, nor is it an endorsement or endorsement of any product, service or company. does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in or in connection with this article.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *